Open shawkins opened 1 year ago
@shawkins will get back this week hopefully
@shawkins sorry to have dropped the ball so badly on this. Does it still need reviewing?
@shawkins sorry to have dropped the ball so badly on this. Does it still need reviewing?
Yes it still needs to be reviewed. There are some pending changes from @lburgazzoli that I'll make part of this pr as well.
@lburgazzoli incorporated the changes from the google doc, but omitted the part about polling based upon generation - that seems out of scope for this doc and would probably need to mention a watching paradigm in addition to polling.
@tombentley should be ready for review now.
@emmanuelbernard @danielezonca please review or delegate so that this can move forward
@emmanuelbernard still waiting for your review on this one.
Resolves #81: this covers the pattern for fleet shard status that was discussed in an architecture call and several follow-up working group meetings.
The only major pending change is that @lburgazzoli would like to expand on the current vs desired state section to include a recommendation on using a generation field to know more precisely when the condition was observed. That can be added after an initial merge if needed.
cc @tombentley