Closed decarlof closed 8 years ago
Good point about the PVs. Also you might find it easier to read the changes I propose in the doc so I made a build under my account at http://dquality.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ Let's keep the pull request open till we meet on Friday if you don't mind, same changes I made are really just a proposal.
ops! you just merged ... well is github = we can always undo it ....
ups, didn't read your emal. I will undo it and keep it open as you suggested.
From: Francesco De Carlo [notifications@github.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 2:08 PM To: bfrosik/data-quality Cc: Frosik, Barbara B. Subject: Re: [data-quality] Added Example and tested funtionalities (#7)
ops! you just merged ... well is github = we can always undo it ....
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/bfrosik/data-quality/pull/7#issuecomment-193427278.
will go through soon... I would keep the project name dquality for both the Github and Docs (to have the same name with the import quality
).
Added epics interface and tested on PVs from the APS. Added examples to test file integrity (structure and array dimensions), directory monitoring and data quality functions. All is working great! In the process I propose new names for modules and functions. The docs are updated.