Closed muschellij2 closed 5 months ago
Hi John @muschellij2 , thanks for the suggestion. I need to look at this a little closer so I'm going to hold off on merging the pull request for now. I agree that recreating the time stamps slows down agcalibrate
but my goal was to try and get something close to the output you get from GGIR. I still need to test it more, but if you run GGIR::g.calibrate
it applies the calibration coefficients but also imputes the time gaps into the data frame. The number of rows would also be different from all the agread
parsers since all methods read in the zeros before converting to ActiGraph counts to get us closer to the *.agd files. I'll look into other ways to speed it up as I never thought merge
was the best option. I'm open to your ideas here.
It looks like the conversion to a data.table
speeds up the merge function. Users may want to impute the time gaps similar to GGIR, but I created an imputeTimeGaps
argument set to FALSE as default in case someone wants the zero data. Both methods are relatively fast now and your suggestion is set to default since it is more memory friendly to R's global environment.
It's unclear to me why you need to create timestamps, or anything of the like from the raw data when you do the calibration. It would seem as though you should be able to just get the calibration coefficients from the function similar to what you do in GGIR, and simply apply them.