Not enough elaboration for how certain commands adds value to the User

[bhnuka]

As of now, most of your commands in the User Guide state how a command is useful becuase of "X" (i.e You can delete tag(s) from a task in your task list, so that you can remove unwanted or irrelevant tags.). However, would be good to contextualise how that would be useful to the target audience (i.e event planners of all kinds). (i.e say something like "When an event planner adds tags, they might accidentally add one in a rush, given how much they have to input.")

[nus-se-script]

Team's Response

We do not believe that it is necessary to contextualize our commands for very specific scenarios like the one you mentioned.

The requirement for UG explanations is:

We have explained the target user clearly in the introduction. It is not a requirement for us to contextualize every single command in the user guide to specific scenarios.

We believe that the current sentence sufficiently relates the benefit to the target user, and explains their functionality clearly. Besides, we feel that the suggestion provided by the tester is arbitrarily specific and not meaningful.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---