Closed bholloway closed 5 years ago
Hi there! I'm testing it on my app and it's already in production :)
Here's my setup :
const { environment } = require('@rails/webpacker')
// Load Webpack config
const bootstrap = require('./loaders/bootstrap')
const datatables = require('./loaders/datatables')
const erb = require('./loaders/erb')
const jquery = require('./loaders/jquery')
const modernizr_loader = require('./loaders/modernizr_loader')
const modernizr_resolver = require('./loaders/modernizr_resolver')
const yadcf = require('./loaders/yadcf')
const webpack = require('webpack')
// Load resolve-url-loader
environment.loaders.get('sass').use.splice(-1, 0, {
loader: 'resolve-url-loader'
})
// Replace existing coffee loader with CS2 version
const babel_loader = environment.loaders.get('babel')
environment.loaders.insert('coffee', {
test: /\.coffee(\.erb)?$/,
use: babel_loader.use.concat(['coffee-loader'])
})
// Add Webpack loaders
environment.loaders.append('bootstrap', bootstrap)
environment.loaders.append('datatables', datatables)
environment.loaders.append('erb', erb)
environment.loaders.append('jquery', jquery)
environment.loaders.append('modernizr_loader', modernizr_loader)
environment.loaders.append('yadcf', yadcf)
// Merge Modernizr config
environment.config.merge(modernizr_resolver)
// Export configured environment
module.exports = environment
It solves an issue with JQueryUI where images were not exported.
Thank you!
As requested in #98, some feedback on the two engines:
engine:rework
seems to work without regression; but continues the trend of having path corruption in source map sources when building on Windows systems.
engine:postcss
lessens the above path corruption considerably. (Only repeats the rooted disk path once, rather than n times.) However, the content of mapped sources is lost.
However, the content of mapped sources is lost.
The same here. See https://github.com/bholloway/resolve-url-loader/issues/98#issuecomment-417072239.
So as discussed in #98 there is a fix for output source-map missing sourcesContent
.
This is published as version 3.0.0-alpha.2
with updated dist-tag next
.
This is published as version 3.0.0-alpha.2 with updated dist-tag next.
Awesome! It's working well :)
Working well sofar for the project I'm working on as well. Haven't heard of further issues than those resolved with alpha.2
@rjgotten from my side I am checking correctness of a billion source-maps from the e2e tests. Following that I am happy to make a beta
release.
Once at beta
I am unsure. This is a big rewrite so I am wondering how cautious to be.
Either
@next
version in capitals.Happy to take thoughts. If there is any regressions with release then I might be having to make frantic fixes and imposing on those here to retest.
On the subject of outgoing source-maps...
engine:postcss 👍
The mappings look good for the 10 cases in the e2e tests. I reviewed both development
and production
output.
The e2e tests are relatively simple cases but it gives some confidence, and really this is postcss
concern anyhow.
engine:rework
The mappings look okay in development
. 👍
They look okay in production
for webpack < 4
👍
However they seem to be systematically flawed in production
for webpack = 4
💩
This is published as version 3.0.0-beta.1
with updated dist-tag next
.
3.0.0-beta.1
Please refer to the beta on npm. Install using dist-tag resolve-url-loader@next
.
As per the readme, version 3 brings postcss
parser.
Please try the beta and vote :thumbsup: or :thumbsdown: for release based on whether it works for your use case.
If you vote :thumbsdown: please post detail any problems below.
Only 3 thumbs in a week. But I am inclined to release (today?) anyhow.
Either way I think it is time to be on master
per PR #101 .
🎉 Published as resolve-url-loader@3.0.0 🎉
Thanks for all your help!
I shall close the issue but please feel free to continue commenting.
Finally
rework
has been updated topostcss
!An alpha is available as resolve-url-loader@next. This
dist-tag
will be updated as we near release.Refer to the readme for migration instructions.
Breaking Changes
Feedback required
Moving forward on this release is contingent to a few questions..
engine: rework
?engine: postcss
(i.e. the new default) ?And it would be nice to know...
Maturity
For an alpha this seems (to me) pretty robust.
The only API that is in question is the
join
function. This is advanced feature and is unlikely to be needed by most users. If you intend to use a customjoin
(in place of the file search "magic") then please let me know.I've not tested any complex (real-world) builds. If you have a use-case you can encode into an example project then I'm definitely interested.