Closed GinaPrese closed 11 years ago
Hello,
In similar situations, pls consider introducing a say-01 concept and then use its ARG structure. David in this situation would be :arg2.
@David cv, Depending on country it is already done.
(s / say-01
:ARG1 (d / do-02
:ARG1 (i / it)
:manner (a2 / already)
:condition (d2 / depend-01
:ARG1 (c2 / country)))
:ARG2 (p / person
:name (n / name
:op1 "David"
:op2 "cv")))
@ - is a form of addressing someone in chats, SNS, etc. (i'm saying this to/@ user name)
For the forum Ids you mention, you can annotate these as :arg2 of say-01 and represent them as NEs. @secondchance or @RobCe things yo
For LOL-like expressions: LOL > You could annotate it as a normal concept and use :mode expressive. I will look a bit more into this, and should there be a change in approach, I will send an update.
Thank you, Madalina
Hello !! Me too I have found somethig similar !
For example, I have this one : Ooooooh! That ought to scare 'em... I think to annotate using multi-sentence and mode expressive...
(m / multi-sentence :snt1 (o / Ooooooh :mode expressive) :snt2 (o2 / obligate-01 :ARG0 (t / that) :ARG2 (s / scare-01 :ARG0 t :ARG1 (t2 / they))))
Thank you,
Denisa
That seems ok.
Thank you, Mădălina!
Issue closed.
Hello again,
this new topic refers to structures which I think are a sort of forum postings, answers to forum users like:
@secondchance or @RobC
How do you annotate @ (as an answer to an online forum user) or LOL! (laughing out loud, in the following context: Now, THAT'S a link! LOL! ) for that matter?
Thank you for any helpful suggestion.
Georgina Presecan