Closed denip closed 11 years ago
I am sorry about the way this sentence appear here...when I copied it was as in the editor...
IMO is indeed "in my opinion", so you should consider using the frame opine-01
. Since you also have think-01
, IMO is somewhat redundant, but in order to keep both, I would suggest an "and", with the 2 predicates on the 2 :ops and it is a great idea as :arg1 under both.
Hello Bianca, thank you for the explanation. So, it should be something like this ?
:ARG2 (a / and :op1 (o / opine-01 :ARG0 (i / i)) :op2 (t2 / think-01 :ARG0 i) :ARG1 (i2 / idea :mod (g / great) :domain (t3 / that)
The only thing to add is that i2 (coreference) should also be annotated as arg1 under opine-01
Hello everyone !!
I have found a new kind of sentence, in which I have a capital letter word unknown, I am not sure how it should be annotated. The sentence is like this :+1:
I don't know how she feels about running, but, IMO, I think that it is a great idea.
The IMO is the problem here. I was thinking to annotate in this manner:
(c / contrast-01 :ARG1 (k / know-01 :ARG0 (i / i) :ARG1 (t / thing :ARG1-of (f / feel-01 :ARG0 (s / she) :ARG2 (r / run-02)))) :ARG2 (t2 / think-01 :ARG0 i :ARG1 (i2 / idea :mod (g / great) :domain (t3 / that)) :manner (i3 / IMO))) It is ok ? Or should I separate the components ? I assume it's about In My Opinion..(IMO), I don't know..
Thank you,
Denisa T.