Closed mvahowe closed 4 years ago
mvahowe
commented
4 years ago The versification WG signed off on this yesterday, so I think we can merge this. The next steps are
jonathanrobie
commented
4 years ago The specification itself goes into the Copenhagen Alliance repo, I think.
Jonathan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:15 AM Mark Howe notifications@github.com wrote:
The versification WG signed off on this yesterday, so I think we can merge this. The next steps are
- finalising the versification flavor which will have this JSON as probably its only ingredient
- making this the required format for versification in the textTranslation flavor.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bible-technology/scripture-burrito/pull/163#issuecomment-604455209, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANPTPOLD43KPRLLH4UXCLTRJNPPVANCNFSM4LGNBXEQ .
jonathanrobie
commented
4 years ago I created this directory in the Copenhagen Alliance repository:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:49 AM Jonathan Robie jonathan.robie@gmail.com wrote:
The specification itself goes into the Copenhagen Alliance repo, I think.
Jonathan
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:15 AM Mark Howe notifications@github.com wrote:
The versification WG signed off on this yesterday, so I think we can merge this. The next steps are
- finalising the versification flavor which will have this JSON as probably its only ingredient
- making this the required format for versification in the textTranslation flavor.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bible-technology/scripture-burrito/pull/163#issuecomment-604455209, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANPTPOLD43KPRLLH4UXCLTRJNPPVANCNFSM4LGNBXEQ .
jonathanrobie
commented
4 years ago The Copenhagen Alliance directory is now committed here:
I have not yet connected this to the main public page, I'll do that after we discuss.
jag3773
commented
4 years ago @jonathanrobie Shouldn't the versification schema be in it's own repository in https://github.com/Copenhagen-Alliance/ ?
jag3773
commented
4 years ago This has moved over to CA and will soon get it's own repository.
This PR relates to #49. The details were discussed in the Copenhagen Alliance versification meetings. Things to note include
We should probably constrain the partial verse strings but I'm not sure how. (I did see an issue with validation of partial verse segments in USX3 recently which suggests that it's not trivial.)
The verification section is fairly free form because, right now, we have no clue about the details of present or future verifiers. I thought that the bare minimum information we need is the name of the verifier and what the boolean result was.
@jonathanrobie I assume we want to hold this PR for the next Versification committee meeting? Maybe we could invite them to take a look here before the next meeting?