search

bible-technology / scripture-burrito

Scripture Burrito Schema & Docs 🌯
http://docs.burrito.bible/
MIT License
21 stars 13 forks source link

Do we need Versification as a standalone Burrito? #226

Closed jag3773 closed 3 years ago

jag3773 commented 3 years ago

What are the use cases for having standalone versification burritos?

jag3773 commented 3 years ago

Possibly create folders inside of https://github.com/Copenhagen-Alliance/versification-specification which represent each scheme as a distinct SB.

jtauber commented 3 years ago

As I see it, the use case for a standalone versification burrito is to exchange a versification system without reinventing a metadata / packaging format for doing so.

For example, the individual versification systems under Copenhagen Alliance are just provided as raw data with no metadata. If metadata were to be added, would CA want to invent their own metadata format or could they just use SB? If the latter, that's our use case, in my opinion.

jonathanrobie commented 3 years ago

I think CA would create their own metadata format.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:27 AM James Tauber notifications@github.com wrote:

As I see it, the use case for a standalone versification burrito is to exchange a versification system without reinventing a metadata / packaging format for doing so.

For example, the individual versification systems under Copenhagen Alliance are just provided as raw data with no metadata. If metadata were to be added, would CA want to invent their own metadata format or could they just use SB? If the latter, that's our use case, in my opinion.

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bible-technology/scripture-burrito/issues/226#issuecomment-737993298, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANPTPNQFRYGKB24HHHHUZTSS6G4VANCNFSM4TTQ7B6A .

jtauber commented 3 years ago

If we don't need to exchange a versification system as a burrito, should this be closed?

It seems to me one might want to exchange versification systems between software, though.

jonathanrobie commented 3 years ago

I think we could close this. I do think that we need to be able to refer to "the versification used in this other project" and do diffs from there.

jag3773 commented 3 years ago

We've agreed to remove this in the next release. Note that #212 is still needed.

jtauber commented 3 years ago

I have a PR ready to go for this but want to briefly discuss on the call the fact this means there are now no examples of peripheral flavors.

jag3773 commented 3 years ago

As discussed last week, that's OK. We'll add some other soon (lexicons, translation manuals, etc)