Closed Gilles86 closed 4 years ago
So the options would be:
B1map
and B1minusmap
B1map
and Sensmap
B1plusmap
and B1minusmap
B1map
+ B1plusmap
) and B1minusmap
First off, would 4 be possible? I've almost never seen anyone who uses B1map
to refer to B1minusmap
. Can we somehow accommodate that interchangeability in the spec? I know this is not ideal, but don't know which one would be more expensive. Changing everything or having two labels pointing to the same entity?
I think B1map is not in the spec yet. Only in some of our other examples. So I really prefer option 3.
Stupid qustion:are the B1minusmaps in the MPM examples really B1 minus maps?
Let's discuss this in the meeting later.
On Wed, 15 May 2019, 16:32 Agah, notifications@github.com wrote:
So the options would be:
- B1map and B1minusmap
- B1map and Sensmap
- B1plusmap and B1minusmap
- (B1map + B1plusmap) and B1minusmap
First off, would 4 be possible? I've almost never seen anyone who uses B1map to refer to B1minusmap. Can we somehow accommodate that interchangeability in the spec? I know this is not ideal, but don't know which one would be more expensive. Changing everything or having two labels pointing to the same entity?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bids-standard/bep001/issues/51?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIPRTW3XXVM6VWQ7HRJEYTPVQNIDA5CNFSM4HND3NK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVO3KJI#issuecomment-492680485, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPRTQALNWPEEQHR7WNTNTPVQNIDANCNFSM4HND3NKQ .
Stupid qustion:are the B1minusmaps in the MPM examples really B1 minus maps?
Need to go back to method paper to find out.
Let's discuss this in the meeting later.
Cool!
+1 on option 3 as well then.
From the original paper:
The MPM comprised three multi-echo 3D FLASH (fast low angle shot) scans, one RF transmit field map and one static magnetic (B0) field map scan (Weiskopf et al., 2011).
The h-MRI toolbox allows generation of a B1minus
map (N4ITK kind of bias correction) if inputs for B1map fitting (3D segmented EPI) are not provided by user. At 3T, B1+ and B1- are fairly comparable, but not quite sure how processing advances in that case.
OK, but a standard MPM protocol then apparently includes a B1 plus map right?
On Wed, 15 May 2019, 16:56 Agah, notifications@github.com wrote:
From the original paper:
The MPM comprised three multi-echo 3D FLASH (fast low angle shot) scans, one RF transmit field map and one static magnetic (B0) field map scan (Weiskopf et al., 2011).
The h-MRI toolbox allows generation of a B1minus map (N4ITK kind of bias correction) if inputs for B1map fitting (3D segmented EPI) are not provided by user. At 3T, B1+ and B1- are fairly comparable, but not quite sure how processing advances in that case.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bids-standard/bep001/issues/51?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIPRTXBX3O7WYDS7YUADRDPVQQBTA5CNFSM4HND3NK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODVO5ZWI#issuecomment-492690649, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPRTUDV7AC5ATVC5UUIITPVQQBTANCNFSM4HND3NKQ .
@christophephillips - can you answer this question? What is expected for the MPM protocol?
As far as I understand MPM/hMRI uses both transmit and receive fields (although if I’m not wrong Weiskopf 2013 only used B1+, B1- was added after and is now part of hMRI in Tabelow 2019). The MPM protocol I use definitely includes both. I’d love to hear confirmation from actual MPM experts like @ChristophePhillips though!
Hey,
I notice that there are some inconsistencies in the spec right now. So in general, people seem to use
B1map
andB1plusmap
interchangeably. But for the MPM examples, we useB1minusmap
. What should we do here? Replace everything withB1plusmap
?-Gilles