bids-standard / bep001

Project management repository (primarily issues) for BIDS Extension Proposal 001
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
8 stars 11 forks source link

Relationship of new modality labels to existing for proton density acquisitions #52

Closed nicholst closed 5 years ago

nicholst commented 5 years ago

Jumping in here without having been involved much... hope this is isn't annoyingly obvious/redundant...

In reviewing bep001's 04-modality-specific-files/01-magnetic-resonance-imaging-data.md I noticed there is

Name _suffix Description
Proton density weighted images PDw Denotes images with predominant PD contrast.

while in the current standard we have in 04-modality-specific-files/01-magnetic-resonance-imaging-data.md we currently have

Name _suffix Description
Proton density PD  

Is the proposal to remove PD and replace it with PDw? While that is most logical, it represents a non-backwards compatible change; also, it suggests that current modality label PDT2 should also be revised to PDT2w (or PDwT2w?).

As this looks rather mature, seems sensible to think about how this will merge with the existing standard.

Gilles86 commented 5 years ago

Is the proposal to remove PD and replace it with PDw?

Yes. We are going to make a 'legacy'-part of the big table where we put some the suffixes that are already in the spec but we recommend not to use anymore.

See https://github.com/bids-standard/bep001/issues/55