bids-standard / bep001

Project management repository (primarily issues) for BIDS Extension Proposal 001
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
8 stars 11 forks source link

Agenda for (second) May call | Wed 29 4pm / 3pm / 10noon / 7am #57

Closed KirstieJane closed 4 years ago

KirstieJane commented 5 years ago

Next dev call: Wednesday 29 May at 4pm CEST / 3pm BST / 10am EDT / 7am PDT

All welcome, please see BIDS mailing list for zoom link (or ping @KirstieJane!)

Agenda

The following points are put in place by @KirstieJane after the call on 15 May....they might move around as we develop and discuss the extension 😸

Document merged changes: @KirstieJane & @agahkarakuzu

There are a few changes that are already merged to master but that aren't reflected in the ProposedChangesToSpecification.md file.

Update the examples: @lazaral, @tiborauer, @christophephillips & @Gilles86

General driving principle is that for each new concept in the specification we have an example in the text (and maybe as a dataset?)

Empty files correctly named: @lazaral

Issues #34 & #46.

Real data in BIDS format: @tiborauer, @christophephillips & @Gilles86

Issue #11.

List of metadata terms

Do the metadata terms that we have listed contain the information needed to run the processing pipelines? Are there any missing?

Run hmri toolbox on BIDS formatted data: @christophephillips

Specifically, can we run the hmri toolbox on BEP001 formatted data? (And get out BEP001 formatted data!)

Field maps: @agahkarakuzu

Expand definition of field maps in specification. Issue #44.

Symbolic links: @KirstieJane

Need to add to the specification something about being able to symlink derivatives files to raw. See #25

Timeline

It would be GREAT to get a PR open to the main specification before OHBM. Documenting what we have done (and why we have done it) is one of the big steps in getting there.... πŸ’ͺ Keep up the hard work πŸ‹οΈ πŸ‹οΈβ€β™€οΈ πŸ‘Ύ

We'll plan to meet in person at OHBM in the Open Science Room: https://github.com/ohbm/OpenScienceRoom2019/issues/18

ChristophePhillips commented 5 years ago

Hi, I might be a bit late for the meeting. Moreover since I'm running behind the clock I haven't sufficiently investigated the MPM data set to provide a nice feedback on how it BIDSifies, if parameters are missing or not matching definitions in BIDS, etc. Sorry about that ! At the latest, I'll do that during the Hackathon in Rome.