search

bids-standard / bep001

Project management repository (primarily issues) for BIDS Extension Proposal 001
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
8 stars 11 forks source link

Incorporate work done on INCF in extension proposal #7

Closed Gilles86 closed 5 years ago

Gilles86 commented 6 years ago

A group of people have done some great work on INCF and we talked about it during a BIDS meeting.

See here for the original document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HfCjPKCXqTckB0OPs-Py06yY2gPYaFGc0sFTPB74fEA/edit#

I think there are some great suggestions, such as using the suffix _MPM for MPM acquisitions and the acq-field to indicate which acquisition is mostly weighted like what.

There are also some nice examples for VFA, MT, B1...

I think it would be good to include them in the current draft. Any opinions on this? Anyone wants to make a commit for this?

See also: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1awzGVflxXiWtzeLVOH5XI8Bar2ND9759yZxsK3stCzc/edit#gid=0

agahkarakuzu commented 6 years ago

Thank you @Gilles86 for reading the document. Happy that suggestions sounded reasonable, I put some effort into coming up with a naming convention that can work for everyone and is virtually scalable. I am aware that the list provided in the spreadsheet can be lengthened almost indefinitely. This is the reason why I tried to include methods that can be carried out using stock sequences.

Currently, most of the qMRI vs BIDS discussion is focusing on the terminological accuracy/consistency/quality of certain key tags in the sidecar jsons. I indeed agree that reaching a consensus regarding these issues is principally important to achieve a sustainable standard.

However, practically, above concerns should not prevent suggestions in the INCF document to be included in the current BEP draft. As can be seen in the spreadsheet, adding them does not bring lots of new key tags to be dealt with, as varying parameters scoped by MPM and the MP2RAGE already cover 4/5 of all varying parameters. I mean 20% of the methods listed in the spreadsheet covers 80% of the varying fields, sounds Pareto efficient. 😄

Gilles86 commented 5 years ago

This is being addressed in pull request https://github.com/bids-standard/bep001/pull/13