Closed KirstieJane closed 4 years ago
Sure - some is still in progress (I've been away for the past two weeks and back later this week) but I'll sort it out before the next meeting.
Yes, I've got a few "free days" to re-focus on the MPM data before next meeting. @lazaral, let's sort this out! :-)
I pushed this a bit forward, I think we are nearly there with the MPM dataset (although it may change depending on the #73 discussion)
In #59 @agahkarakuzu has written the following table & explanatory text:
Although there is not an upper limit to the amount of metadata for images collected by a
grouping suffix
, some of the metadata entries become REQUIRED when considered within the context of a specific qMRI application.This prompted @Gilles86 & me to think about what the rules need to be for the validator for different suffices.
My opinion is that it isn't very helpful to separate the metadata into required and optional and varying and constant. Better to just focus on what would be REQUIRED.
@lazaral and @ChristophePhillips - we had a look at some of the MPM datasets in https://osf.io/k4bs5 and got kinda confused 😬 Do you think it might be possible to harmonise those in advance of next Wednesday's meeting (#74, 13 Nov)? I think it would be really helpful to continue the editing of #59 to get it merged to master ✨
Thank you again everyone for your awesome work 💪