bids-standard / bids-2-devel

Discussions and suggestions of backwards incompatible changes to BIDS
https://bids.neuroimaging.io/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
10 stars 1 forks source link

Formalize procedure of issues triage for BIDS 2.0 project #56

Closed yarikoptic closed 2 months ago

yarikoptic commented 11 months ago

In principle all issues we have already filed should go through the BIDS 2.0 and be moved from "No status" to either "Punted" or "Todo" or even "In progress" or "Done" if somehow in those advanced stages.

There is a listing of issues sorted by :+1: which could be of help to choose candidates

tsalo commented 10 months ago

I like that. I tried to classify the proposals based on their predicted level of impact, but we definitely need to label them based on status as well.

yarikoptic commented 2 months ago

I think it would be useful now to come up with a criteria (e.g. difference between :-1: - :+1:) to give some objective (automate in CI?) criteria when issue could be closed as "voted down". Sure thing someone with strong feeling could always "save" it and reopen/refile later on for further discussion/consideration. I propose difference of 3 (e.g. having 3 :-1: or 5 :-1: and 2 :+1: s). WDYT?

yarikoptic commented 2 months ago

Ok , for now it would be

Decided by @yarikoptic with possible input from the community, based on difference between 👎 - 👍 or lack of enthusiasm/activity from others.

Reopen if you would propose to refine and how