bids-standard / bids-2-devel

Discussions and suggestions of backwards incompatible changes to BIDS
https://bids.neuroimaging.io/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
10 stars 1 forks source link

Allow composition of a BIDS dataset (dataset level) from smaller (subj or subj/ses) level #59

Open yarikoptic opened 8 months ago

yarikoptic commented 8 months ago

Use cases

What if we allowed e.g. sub-X[/ses-Y] to be a bids dataset on its own! That aligns well with #54 which then would allow for the "flat" (no folders) within that dataset -- its dataset_description.json would just say that.

edit: previously had "study" in the title but IMHO it is misleading, replaced with "dataset level"

edit2: aligns with the work of @neuromechanist @dorahermes @VisLab on extending formalization of stimuli directory. If that directory starts to follow BIDS principle/organization itself, e.g. following suggested by me https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/issues/751 (stimuli BEP) but without hierarchy (#TODO issue on alternative hierarchies) then we make it all consistent.

edit: another alignment:

edit3: similarish approach is taken by a2cps (attn @patrick....) on converting each subj session into independent bids dataset for processing and then "Collating" them together for the release.