Closed arokem closed 4 months ago
The intention was for the prior column, "Relevant data representations", to impose restrictions at a higher level. Ie. Since SphericalHarmonicBasis
is only "relevant" for "Spherical harmonics", the "REQUIRED
" designation applies only when the data representation is "spherical harmonics". However you're right in that this hierarchical state of requirements of metadata is unclear.
I would add also that eg. if the data representation is something other than "Spherical harmonics", then a metadata field like SphericalHarmonicBasis
MUST NOT be specified.
So both cases require qualification before the table is presented.
Currently, orientation specification details (e.g.,
Directions
) are designated asREQUIRED
metadata, but they should not be required for mdp that are directionally invariant (e.g., FA). We should clarify that.SphericalHarmonicBasis
andSphericalHarmonicDegree
are in addition also only relevant for representations that use spherical harmonics, so they should only beREQUIRED
for those cases. Again, needs clarification.