ATM we have not schematized the relationships we might have between our metadata fields and (meta)data from DICOMS. We express it in free word form and that is why we lack consistency (hence #1450 and fresh #1758). I think, with possible future extensions in mind, we should add to schema for metadata fields
Inspired by
ATM we have not schematized the relationships we might have between our metadata fields and (meta)data from DICOMS. We express it in free word form and that is why we lack consistency (hence #1450 and fresh #1758). I think, with possible future extensions in mind, we should add to schema for metadata fields
e.g.
or
where
is
identicalTo
andderivedFrom
(until we run into use case).This would