Open AbhayVAshokan opened 1 month ago
@neerajsingh0101
Understood. The idea of this issue is to make sure that we have a good experience while using neetoEditor and not push newer features.
cc: @deepakjosp, @sumanranjanpanda
@AbhayVAshokan sounds good.
@neerajsingh0101 @AbhayVAshokan Please check let me know your thoughts.
https://praveen-murali.neetorecord.com/watch/5bc8c4d3-9edc-4fdd-bd9a-947092ddeaa3
Before and after - Figma
@praveen-murali-ind All the points you mentioned are valid. All the suggestions look solid. Let's roll with it.
@AbhayVAshokan @deepakjosp Please add the following issues to the Neeto Editor project board or to Abhay's board.
https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1122 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1131 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1126 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1130 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1132 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1123 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1133 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1134 https://github.com/bigbinary/neeto-editor/issues/1135
@AbhayVAshokan I've merged the feature branch to the main branch. For the rest of the sub issues let's create PR to the main branch.
This issue aims to revamp neetoEditor to solve all the UI, UX, and performance challenges and make it on par with the competitors.
Video explanation: https://abhay-ashokan.neetorecord.com/watch/dd81c94a-72e9-4e99-a0d5-74806a92d676
References
@neerajsingh0101 LMK your thoughts.
enhancement _t
cc: @sumanranjanpanda, @sandip-mane, @Aditya-Bakshi5, @deepakjosp