Closed ypriverol closed 1 year ago
Sonatype Lift will be retiring on Sep 12, 2023, with its analysis stopping on Aug 12, 2023. We understand that this news may come as a disappointment, and Sonatype is committed to helping you transition off it seamlessly. If you’d like to retain your data, please export your issues from the web console. We are extremely grateful and thank you for your support over the years.
Are tolerence parameters in the comment
? We may need to filter projects based on resolution in some use cases (AI training). What do you think?
Is there any order associated with these sets? Or just sorted lexicographically?
Are tolerence parameters in the
comment
? We may need to filter projects based on resolution in some use cases (AI training). What do you think?
If we add more comment
attributes, then we should add them as key value pairs, including the Fragmentation types.
Something like:
`adquisition_properties`: [
{`precursor tolerance`: `0.05 Da`},
{`dissociation method`: `HCD`}
]
I like to still have in to other properties as summary the instrument and enzyme. What do you think @daichengxin
Is there any order associated with these sets? Or just sorted lexicographically?
This is a good question, I think .json
do not enforce any order?
My concern is that without the full mapping of metadata to quants (file+channel) it gets less useful for AI. Or I did not properly understand the scope of this json …
My concern is that without the full mapping of metadata to quants (file+channel) it gets less useful for AI. Or I did not properly understand the scope of this json …
This JSON is the project description and have served to the following use case:
We will need a different file for the mapping between file channel or that mapping should be included in every file.
I like to still have in to other properties as summary the instrument and enzyme. What do you think @daichengxin
I like the key value pairs. Maximum Missed Cleavages Setting: PRIDE:0000074
would be a key property for enzyme.
@daichengxin @timosachsenberg @jpfeuffer I updated the PR with the information about how do I think we should update the MSstats output. ☝️ DE.md and AE.md.
The major changes are that I suggest adding a valid header
section that explain for our users what each column means. The header start with a #
which make this version compatible with MSstats. Please feel free to add more information in the header. This will help us to load the MSstats output into a web page and visualize the DE values.
Does SampleID
or Sample_ID
look better? The current output of ibaqpy is the former. @ypriverol
Does
SampleID
orSample_ID
look better? The current output of ibaqpy is the former. @ypriverol
This has been solved.
This is the first section of the quantms files, including the
project.json
and the.sdrf.tsv
. The main idea of the format and use cases is discussed on issue #1