Background image doesn't always replace background color

[nickendle]

The description for the background image states 'repeating image replaces background color' -- but I'm still seeing the background color in a few places.

[outerim]

I don't think the replaces comment is accurate. I believe the behavior is intentional. In fact they both are applied in the CSS regardless and if you upload a transparent bg image it actually shows through.

[nickendle]

I see what you're saying, but it seems a little odd that when I pick a background color it's applied to every section on the page (minus where the accent color is used). But if I upload a background image, it's selective and doesn't apply to the header/footer.

Either way I agree the language could be changed.

[outerim]

Oh, hmm I guess that is a bit odd...

[coryetzkorn]

Would this wording solve the confusion? "Repeating image selectively replaces background color."

Or maybe this: Background Image "Optional (repeating pattern suggested)."

Secondary background Image "Optional (repeating pattern suggested)."

[coryetzkorn]

Updated the description language.. should be more clear now.