Resolves #295. @jpdna I'll test this and let you know if this winds up being much of an accuracy change. Thanks for catching this! Also, this needs some more tests to catch the bad behavior.
Coverage remained the same at 79.929% when pulling c0ab9ff0d09a7f5303e0804e9fc666dd49a51636 on fnothaft:issues/295-fix-qual-index into e0979dd11a2fd0fd8714cd062b9e7ee835a265e5 on bigdatagenomics:master.
Resolves #295. @jpdna I'll test this and let you know if this winds up being much of an accuracy change. Thanks for catching this! Also, this needs some more tests to catch the bad behavior.