Open mirix opened 5 years ago
Ok, the problem is that I included crystallographic waters along with my ligand. If I remove them, the program runs smoothly.
Which makes me wonder, what happens if one has one ligand plus one cofactor?
I am using QVina instead of Vina. It is significantly faster.
Thanks for this email - that is very useful to note.
Phil
On 13 Dec 2018, at 08:19, mirix notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:
I am using QVina instead of Vina. It is significantly faster.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/bigginlab/WaterDock-2.0/issues/1#issuecomment-446845972, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APMck5aRp2QYNAwiHIG3kNsU1C0adADVks5u4eNmgaJpZM4ZPF4w.
Phil Biggin, CChem, FRSC. Professor of Computational Biochemistry Fellow and Tutor at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford Chair of the Molecular Graphics and Modelling Society Department of Biochemistry South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QU E: Philip.biggin@bioch.ox.ac.ukmailto:Philip.biggin@bioch.ox.ac.uk W: sbcb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/biggin.phphttp://sbcb.bioch.ox.ac.uk/biggin.php T: +44 1865 613305
Next MGMS event: Big Ideas for Big Data in Drug Discovery Friday 12th April 2019 https://bigdatamgms2019.wordpress.com/
Hi,
I receive the following error when running WaterDock2
File "/home/mirix/Downloads/WaterDock-2.0/waterdock2.py", line 59, in
dockcheck.main(proteinfile, ligandfile)
File "/home/mirix/Downloads/WaterDock-2.0/dockcheck.py", line 114, in main
atomindex = waterdata[i,0]
IndexError: index 9 is out of bounds for axis 0 with size 9
A placedwaters.pdb file with 105 atoms is produced but not a predictedwaters.pdb file.
Best,
Miro