To that end, we know our expression is true when A and B are true, when they are false and when A is true and B is false.
That would be the other way around: when A then B and B is false, so it should be false.
That means we're dealing with OR that has a special trick that a regular OR can't do: return true when A and B are false *. The only way to do that is by negating A: ¬𝐴 ∨ 𝐵.
What
Logic operation Implication
Where
Pages 24-25 of the 001 version, I guess (the PDF is titled
Imposter2_001.pdf
).What did I expect
The truth table for the
implication
in page 25 should displayThe result of the
A -> B
column is reversed. The example on the wikipedia shows1 0 1 1
because the columns are reversed, first the Ts and then the Fs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth_table#Logical_implicationThe explanation on page 24 is also reversed:
That would be the other way around: when A then B and B is false, so it should be false.
* And also return false when A is true.