Open eudesbarbosa opened 2 years ago
Change of plans It is more elegant to simply removed the model subworkflow. It was anyway there just for some possible developments. There is still concern that there might be some silent error associated with problems in the config file. Specifically, that the correct library kit wildcard won't be use for a sample if the library is poorly defined in the config.
Issue The second round of execution of the workflow
targeted_seq_cnv_calling
leads to conflict of input for steptargeted_seq_cnv_calling_gcnv_scatter_intervals
.To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
targeted_seq_cnv_calling
workflow for cohort with two library kits, example: both Agilent SureSelect Human v6 and v8.targeted_seq_cnv_calling
again.... Invalid argument '...targeted_seq_cnv_calling/work/bwa.gcnv_filter_intervals.Agilent_SureSelect_Human_All_Exon_V8/out/bwa.gcnv_filter_intervals.Agilent_SureSelect_Human_All_Exon_V8.interval_list'.