We could implement a sorting mechanism for Largo. Possible ways dor sorting are:
[x] By "patch prototype" to detect outliers (see #88).
[ ] By pixel size. Use case (quoted from email):
This would aid (i) in the process of species identification, where some species are generally smaller (or bigger) than others, (ii) to quickly delete very small annotations (or below a designated body-size threshold), which are also more difficult to confidently, and consistently, identify , and (iii) to quickly check that some point data were not incorrectly recorded as a point instead of measured as a line (or vice versa) during manual image annotation.
[ ] By created_at date of the annotation label (which is not the default because this sorts by annotation ID/creation and not by annotation label ID/creation!).
[ ] By file, i.e. files are ordered by filename (default in the volume overview) and the annotations are then ordered by their IDs within a file. Example: file a with annotations 1 and 3, file b with annotations 2 and 4. The default sorting would display 1, 2, 3, 4. Ordering by file will display 1, 3, 2, 4.
We could implement a sorting mechanism for Largo. Possible ways dor sorting are:
[x] By "patch prototype" to detect outliers (see #88).
[ ] By pixel size. Use case (quoted from email):
[ ] By
created_at
date of the annotation label (which is not the default because this sorts by annotation ID/creation and not by annotation label ID/creation!).[ ] By file, i.e. files are ordered by filename (default in the volume overview) and the annotations are then ordered by their IDs within a file. Example: file a with annotations 1 and 3, file b with annotations 2 and 4. The default sorting would display 1, 2, 3, 4. Ordering by file will display 1, 3, 2, 4.
[ ] By similarity https://github.com/biigle/largo/issues/125