Closed charleygros closed 4 years ago
I guess that was because of patch_size=99
since when running with the default 39
it works well.
That`s correct, a patch size of 99 was too much for the relatively large images and the GPU memory we have available. The memory consumption should adapt to the used parameters but this is done with an imprecise heuristic which can sometimes result in errors like these.
Thanks for your insights @mzur , appreciate this!
Hi @mzur,
I have received the following notification:
Please find here below the parameters:![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14353425/89370889-269ff380-d725-11ea-81f7-bbf377ac9ddd.png)
Could you please help me? Cheers, Charley