Not really an issue, just a suggestion. A bigger button styled like the View Image button would be easier to locate and click. I think it would also make sense to change the View Image icon to an image icon, so you could then use the globe icon for the Search by Image button. That seems more consistent with how these icons are generally used elsewhere on the web. Search functions are often associated with magnifying lenses or globes, and image icons with little illustrations of photographs, like this: <svg width="16" height="16" aria-hidden="true"><path fill-rule="evenodd" d="M1.75 2.5a.25.25 0 00-.25.25v10.5c0 .138.112.25.25.25h.94a.76.76 0 01.03-.03l6.077-6.078a1.75 1.75 0 012.412-.06L14.5 10.31V2.75a.25.25 0 00-.25-.25H1.75zm12.5 11H4.81l5.048-5.047a.25.25 0 01.344-.009l4.298 3.889v.917a.25.25 0 01-.25.25zm1.75-.25V2.75A1.75 1.75 0 0014.25 1H1.75A1.75 1.75 0 000 2.75v10.5C0 14.216.784 15 1.75 15h12.5A1.75 1.75 0 0016 13.25zM5.5 6a.5.5 0 11-1 0 .5.5 0 011 0zM7 6a2 2 0 11-4 0 2 2 0 014 0z"/></svg>
But here's the one I think would be best. Since this is Google it makes sense to use their image_search material icon: <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" width="24"><path d="M0 0h24v24H0z" fill="none"/><path d="M0 0h24v24H0V0z" fill="none"/><path d="M18 13v7H4V6h5.02c.05-.71.22-1.38.48-2H4c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2v14c0 1.1.9 2 2 2h14c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2v-5l-2-2zm-1.5 5h-11l2.75-3.53 1.96 2.36 2.75-3.54zm2.8-9.11c.44-.7.7-1.51.7-2.39C20 4.01 17.99 2 15.5 2S11 4.01 11 6.5s2.01 4.5 4.49 4.5c.88 0 1.7-.26 2.39-.7L21 13.42 22.42 12 19.3 8.89zM15.5 9C14.12 9 13 7.88 13 6.5S14.12 4 15.5 4 18 5.12 18 6.5 16.88 9 15.5 9z"/></svg>
Anyway, thanks for the extension, I'd lose my mind without it.
Not really an issue, just a suggestion. A bigger button styled like the View Image button would be easier to locate and click. I think it would also make sense to change the View Image icon to an image icon, so you could then use the globe icon for the Search by Image button. That seems more consistent with how these icons are generally used elsewhere on the web. Search functions are often associated with magnifying lenses or globes, and image icons with little illustrations of photographs, like this:
<svg width="16" height="16" aria-hidden="true"><path fill-rule="evenodd" d="M1.75 2.5a.25.25 0 00-.25.25v10.5c0 .138.112.25.25.25h.94a.76.76 0 01.03-.03l6.077-6.078a1.75 1.75 0 012.412-.06L14.5 10.31V2.75a.25.25 0 00-.25-.25H1.75zm12.5 11H4.81l5.048-5.047a.25.25 0 01.344-.009l4.298 3.889v.917a.25.25 0 01-.25.25zm1.75-.25V2.75A1.75 1.75 0 0014.25 1H1.75A1.75 1.75 0 000 2.75v10.5C0 14.216.784 15 1.75 15h12.5A1.75 1.75 0 0016 13.25zM5.5 6a.5.5 0 11-1 0 .5.5 0 011 0zM7 6a2 2 0 11-4 0 2 2 0 014 0z"/></svg>But here's the one I think would be best. Since this is Google it makes sense to use their image_search material icon:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" height="24" viewBox="0 0 24 24" width="24"><path d="M0 0h24v24H0z" fill="none"/><path d="M0 0h24v24H0V0z" fill="none"/><path d="M18 13v7H4V6h5.02c.05-.71.22-1.38.48-2H4c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2v14c0 1.1.9 2 2 2h14c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2v-5l-2-2zm-1.5 5h-11l2.75-3.53 1.96 2.36 2.75-3.54zm2.8-9.11c.44-.7.7-1.51.7-2.39C20 4.01 17.99 2 15.5 2S11 4.01 11 6.5s2.01 4.5 4.49 4.5c.88 0 1.7-.26 2.39-.7L21 13.42 22.42 12 19.3 8.89zM15.5 9C14.12 9 13 7.88 13 6.5S14.12 4 15.5 4 18 5.12 18 6.5 16.88 9 15.5 9z"/></svg>Anyway, thanks for the extension, I'd lose my mind without it.