Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Original comment by felix.ob...@netcologne.de
on 15 May 2014 at 7:06
I'm not sure how to fix this issue.
You're asking:
> I don't use the serialization,
Me too
> I am not aware that anyone uses it
Maybe someone at Geodan uses it or think it's useful?
> I don't like the output of the serialization
It's really an issue?
What do you mean for
>leave all serialization responsibility to the clients of this library
there is a way to make serializable a class not marked as serializable?
Original comment by diegogu...@gmail.com
on 5 Jun 2014 at 6:55
>> I don't like the output of the serialization
> It's really an issue?
If it is out, it is out. We can change it now or stick with it
Original comment by felix.ob...@netcologne.de
on 5 Jun 2014 at 10:00
>we can change it now or stick with it
absolutely.
what about removing serialization with a compilation directive also for
standard build, and then make a new release?
with this, we can think about this issue.
Original comment by diegogu...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2014 at 12:17
I had a chat with john diss, and he manifested my impression that it is not
worth it to provide DataContract/DataMember for the PCL classes.
John Diss:
<quote>
I have always hated .net serialization :)
all the stuff assciated with web services was slow and sucky
personally I would rather have a set of classes responsible for serializing to
a given format
</quote>
The previous Silverlight, WindowsPhone and Monodroid versions of NTS lived
without serialization, the PCL will too.
Anyone willing to help, remove the DataContract/DataMember attributes from the
codebase and the associated conditionals. thanks
Original comment by felix.ob...@netcologne.de
on 27 Jun 2014 at 8:27
>Anyone willing to help, remove the DataContract/DataMember attributes
>from the codebase and the associated conditionals. thanks
+1, I can do it easily now
Original comment by diegogu...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2014 at 9:48
or, even better, soon :)
Original comment by diegogu...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2014 at 9:55
removed "stuff" for PCL build only with r1240
Original comment by diegogu...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2014 at 10:45
thanks diego!
Original comment by felix.ob...@netcologne.de
on 1 Jul 2014 at 8:27
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
felix.ob...@netcologne.de
on 15 May 2014 at 7:05