billkarsh / SpikeGLX

SpikeGLX recording system GUI [Neuropixels NI]
Other
83 stars 29 forks source link

NP1.0 vs NP2.0 #23

Closed bruno-f-cruz closed 3 years ago

bruno-f-cruz commented 3 years ago

Hi,

We are about to try out the new 2.0s, but after reading the README I am a bit confused about some of the points:

1) - As always, you should calibrate your HS sample clock rates. These are stored in SpikeGLX using the HS serial number as the key because this a measurement about that particular part. However, imec did not include an EEPROM chip on the 2.0 HS so the HS does not know its own serial number. SpikeGLX will require you to type the serial number into a dialog when you click Detect. You need to have read that from the label on the HS. This will be corrected for 2.0 headstages by imec later. However, using the latest spikeglx version it seems the HS serial number is getting detected automatically (under HSSN). Am I missing something?

2) - Previously we had said it was alright to run NP 20 and NP 1.0 copies of SpikeGLX concurrently. However, we know that 1.0 interferes with data from 2.0 when runs are stopped or started and we don't know if there is interference at other times, so we advise against this now. Can you confirm if this is still the case and, if so, what do you advise to do (i.e. restarting the software each time we switch probes or just have 2 simultaneous versions running on the same computer).

3) RE channelmaps. Am I correct to assume that NPtype21_bank0_refX.imro are the maps that correspond to the deepest channels of the probe in the densest configuration (similar to the NP1.0 default)?

Thanks! B

billkarsh commented 3 years ago

Hi,

Please see the download page for the software https://billkarsh.github.io/SpikeGLX/.

Issue 1) NP 2.0 headstages do not have an EEPROM. You need to do what the instructions say for 2.0 HS calibration. Raed the serial number from the part and enter it manually.

Issue 3) Bank 0 is always the tip (deepest) for all probe types.

Bill

From: bfpcruz [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2020 2:01 PM To: billkarsh/SpikeGLX SpikeGLX@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Subject: [billkarsh/SpikeGLX] NP1.0 vs NP2.0 (#23)

Hi,

We are about to try out the new 2.0s, but after reading the README I am a bit confused about some of the points:

1.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/billkarsh/SpikeGLX/issues/23__;!!Eh6p8Q!RJlaGKvFD3yvcfIU1-VEw9Lss9-xZaOhK4k_4zN2qDa4KHY9UcVjtxttZYKF1VVPb9s$, or unsubscribehttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABWEDUHN3TMOXOJ2I2R2MWLSTPIG7ANCNFSM4UPQWYEQ__;!!Eh6p8Q!RJlaGKvFD3yvcfIU1-VEw9Lss9-xZaOhK4k_4zN2qDa4KHY9UcVjtxttZYKFRVgTiGg$.