Added structureSufffix for structure naming

[SchrodingersGat]

This PR adds the suffix '_packet_t' to structures automatically created based on a packet, rather than simply '_t'

e.g. a packet defined as

<Packet name="Test">
 <Data name="a" inMemoryType="unsigned16"/>
</Packet>

will be structured as:

typedef struct
{
  uint16_t a;
} Test_packet_t;

[SchrodingersGat]

That's a great idea.

[jefffisher]

Maybe prefixes too while you're at it...?

[SchrodingersGat]

In the code there's already provision for:

packetStructureSuffix and packetParameterSuffix - do these achieve similar things?

[billvaglienti]

No, these are the suffix for the function names, not the structure names.

Bill Vaglienti 541 399 7883 4207 Post Canyon Hood River OR, 97031

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Oliver notifications@github.com wrote:

In the code there's already provision for:

packetStructureSuffix and packetParameterSuffix - do these achieve similar things?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/billvaglienti/ProtoGen/pull/57#issuecomment-306095318, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKWWHnc2Yf7qfsRgmAYUhgtagrFjwsXFks5sA3Z5gaJpZM4Nt0K4 .

[SchrodingersGat]

Ah yes. Then structureSuffix and packetSuffix would make sense.