Closed zackkrida closed 9 years ago
I think that distinction between @include and regular property doesn't exist in styles because functions can be called completely transparent to the user, like in the case of nib
.
Call to block-style mixi theoretically can be distinguished from the rest but I also don't feel real need because it's definition can't be properly recognized.
Also as far as actual semantics (scope) that SCSS assigns to these things is not in anyway more logical then what is assigned in stylus.
To top it of this color distinction only exists in several color themes and it is possible for you to add additional scopes to match the desired coloring, at least for function calls.
All in all I feel like this is a won't fix
.
Currently, this package doesn't differentiate styling between selectors (
.class
) and mixins (mixin(), mixin
).In this case, I'd want to see the blue on the last two
div
's in the//scss
example applied to the last twodiv
s of the//stylus
example. Any thoughts on changing this?