Open wilsonehusin opened 2 years ago
bindl exec NAME [args ...] would:
bindl exec NAME [args ...]
args
STDIN
STDOUT
STDERR
The existence and implementation of this would help brainstorming #10.
Considering that #10 is canceled in favor of #39, should this exist? Maybe not?
Maybe instead we should do something like bindl path NAME which returns the whole bin/.bindl/<hash>-NAME/NAME path?
bindl path NAME
bin/.bindl/<hash>-NAME/NAME
bindl exec NAME [args ...]
would:args
are passed directlySTDIN
STDOUT
STDERR
piping properly (relevant)The existence and implementation of this would help brainstorming #10.