There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation and naming things.
Following the famous quote of Phil Karlton I would like to argue about changing the names of the functions. Main intention is to keep it as sync as possible with the pyhton extension pyo_oracle. So we got:
Which in principle would be fine. However, as you may know these are also function names used in sdmpredictors, and by design the R functions will overlap as there is no need to call the namespace in the functions after loading a package.
library(sdmpredictors)
library(biooracler)
# ??? Which one?
list_layers()
One solution
A way to surpass this problem is to add a prefix to the functions that makes them unique. This is widely used within the R community. E.g.
bo_list_layers()
This means that the names of the methods of both the R and python extensions will be slightly different. However, I believe it will make biooracler easier to use and less confusing.
On the other hand, sdmpredictors and biooracler should eventually become one single package, as they have a very similar purpose and they differ mainly in the back-end.
But I would like to discuss this publicly and you may have better arguments. Looking forward to see what you think!
Following the famous quote of Phil Karlton I would like to argue about changing the names of the functions. Main intention is to keep it as sync as possible with the pyhton extension
pyo_oracle. So we got:R
Python
Which in principle would be fine. However, as you may know these are also function names used in
sdmpredictors, and by design the R functions will overlap as there is no need to call the namespace in the functions after loading a package.One solution
A way to surpass this problem is to add a prefix to the functions that makes them unique. This is widely used within the R community. E.g.
This means that the names of the methods of both the R and python extensions will be slightly different. However, I believe it will make
biooraclereasier to use and less confusing.On the other hand,
sdmpredictorsandbiooraclershould eventually become one single package, as they have a very similar purpose and they differ mainly in the back-end.But I would like to discuss this publicly and you may have better arguments. Looking forward to see what you think!