@eparejatobes I think that type().from(...) is quite confusing, because from is used also for the source vertex of an edge, or for the arity direction. Sometimes it's also not obvious what is that type() and what is this .from thing.
I suggest to rename it to something more obvious:
.vertex() and .edge()(I vote for this)
.withValue()(also ok)
.vertexFromRaw() and .edgeFromRaw()(too verbose)
.createFromRaw()(probably "create" is not the best fit)
@eparejatobes I think that
type().from(...)is quite confusing, becausefromis used also for the source vertex of an edge, or for the arity direction. Sometimes it's also not obvious what is thattype()and what is this.fromthing.I suggest to rename it to something more obvious:
.vertex()and.edge()(I vote for this).withValue()(also ok).vertexFromRaw()and.edgeFromRaw()(too verbose).createFromRaw()(probably "create" is not the best fit)