The SecurityDefinitions type defined in the OpenAPI library here
Which is a newtype wrapper over Definitions, which in-turn is a type synonym for an InsOrdHashMap Text type.
SecurityDefinitions seems to be missing type-family instances for Index and IxValue type-families, which enables us to use them with Lenses and refer to their indices using at or ix and set a particular SecurityScheme at that index if needed.
The following instances are already present in the Swagger version of the same data-type here.
Maybe we missed them here. I'll make a PR soon for this.
(Note: They would also need type-class instances for At and Ixed, i'll open a separate issue for that.)
Hi,
The
SecurityDefinitionstype defined in the OpenAPI library hereWhich is a newtype wrapper over Definitions, which in-turn is a type synonym for an
InsOrdHashMap Texttype.SecurityDefinitionsseems to be missing type-family instances forIndexandIxValuetype-families, which enables us to use them with Lenses and refer to their indices usingatorixand set a particularSecuritySchemeat that index if needed.The following instances are already present in the Swagger version of the same data-type here.
Maybe we missed them here. I'll make a PR soon for this.
(Note: They would also need type-class instances for
AtandIxed, i'll open a separate issue for that.)