If this PR adds or updates a recipe, use "Add" or "Update" appropriately as the first word in its title.
New recipes not directly relevant to the biological sciences need to be submitted to the conda-forge channel instead of Bioconda.
PRs require reviews prior to being merged. Once your PR is passing tests and ready to be merged, please issue the @BiocondaBot please add label command.
Please post questions on Gitter or ping @bioconda/core in a comment.
Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify run_exports (see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).
Add a run_exports section like this:
build:
run_exports:
- ...
with ... being one of:
Case
run_exports statement
semantic versioning
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
semantic versioning (0.x.x)
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
known breakage in minor versions
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
known breakage in patch versions
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }} (in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that)
calendar versioning
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}
while replacing "myrecipe" with either name if a name|lower variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.
Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update
Merge the master branch into a PR.
@BiocondaBot please add label
Add the please review & merge label.
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts
Post links to CI-built packages/containers. You can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the @BiocondaBot please merge command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.
Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include `@bioconda/` and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed ``.
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough
## Walkthrough
The pull request introduces updates to the `meta.yaml` file for the `pbaa` package. The primary changes include an increment in the version number from "1.0.3" to "1.1.0" and an update to the SHA256 checksum from "39ee21fc8b94d15f2004afeb34c6370bcb7661f8e29d35ebd50349f0dced472c" to "fb94e8122593a3a6ce6405239645f2f3b15a996113c00ce3872058be9caa1b89". Additional modifications involve the introduction of a `skip-lints` section, the removal of `noarch` from the `build` section, and the addition of new fields such as `skip`, `binary_relocation`, and `run_exports`. These changes reflect updates in versioning, integrity verification, and build configuration while maintaining the overall structure of the `meta.yaml` file.
## Possibly related PRs
- **#51142**: Updates the `meta.yaml` file for the `hmftools-bam-tools` package, including changes to the version and SHA256 checksum.
- **#51154**: Modifies the `meta.yaml` file for the `bactopia-py` package, featuring a version increment and SHA256 checksum update.
- **#51226**: Similar to PR #51154, this PR updates the `bactopia-py` package's `meta.yaml` file with a version bump and SHA256 checksum change.
- **#51430**: Updates the `biobb_amber` package's `meta.yaml` file with a version increment and SHA256 checksum update.
- **#51431**: Changes the `meta.yaml` file for the `biobb_analysis` package, reflecting a version change and SHA256 checksum update.
- **#51435**: Updates the `biobb_chemistry` package's `meta.yaml` file, including a version increment and SHA256 checksum update.
- **#51453**: Modifies the `biobb_cmip` package's `meta.yaml` file with a version change and SHA256 checksum update.
- **#51528**: Updates the `biobb_cp2k` package's `meta.yaml` file, including a version increment and SHA256 checksum update.
- **#51649**: Similar to PR #51430, this PR updates the `biobb_amber` package's `meta.yaml` file with a version change and SHA256 checksum update.
## Suggested labels
`autobump`, `new version`
📜 Recent review details
**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: CHILL**
📥 Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a89d0afd86a46d032386ed56615eec095345096b and c9a355a4848717bb138f96a0c649c06687e6a4b8.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
* recipes/pbaa/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
* recipes/pbaa/meta.yaml
---
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
❤️ Share
- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
- [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai)
- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips
### Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai):
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.`
- `Generate unit testing code for this file.`
- `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.`
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.`
- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.`
- PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.`
- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.`
- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.`
- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.`
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
- `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR.
- `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews.
- `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
- `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR.
- `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
- `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
- `@coderabbitai help` to get help.
### Other keywords and placeholders
- Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
- Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
- Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository.
- Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json`
### Documentation and Community
- Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
Update pbaa version 1.1.0
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add label
command.@bioconda/core
in a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes. This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe. If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports
(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation). Add arun_exports
section like this:with
...
being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}
(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}
(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}
while replacing
"myrecipe"
with eithername
if aname|lower
variable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:@BiocondaBot please update
@BiocondaBot please add label
please review & merge
label.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts
You can use this to test packages locally.
@BiocondaBot please merge
command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead. Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include `@bioconda/