Closed mortonjt closed 4 years ago
@ElDeveloper , is there any chance that this can get merged in? This is becoming a bottleneck when mass producing emperor plots.
@ElDeveloper , I think you are right - this block needs more investigation. Just ran into another issue when I use the patch that I proposed. See #733
Regarding more informative errors, maybe we could just use the index name? That way no new parameters have to be passed in
I've opened a new PR based on these changes, see #734. . It fixes #730 and #733.
Addresses #730
Now when the ignore_missing_samples flag is enabled, features can also be enabled.
This is an easy fix - but maybe the terminology will need to be readdressed (i.e. change ignore_missing_samples -> ignore_missing).