Open antgonza opened 2 years ago
While running some tests with the SEPP placements in Qiita we noticed that the current code rewrites the placements as:
plcmnts['placements'].extend([{'p': placement, 'nm': [[sequence, 1]]} for sequence, placement in placements.items()])
which is currently not supported by bp so we had to rewrite them as:
bp
plcmnts['placements'].extend([{'p': placement, 'n': [sequence, ]} for sequence, placement in placements.items()])
Thus, wondering if this is enough or if there is any reason why bp should support both.
cc: @sjanssen2; BTW the current version can add all the Qiita 150bp deblur fragments into the GG/SEPP backbone in < 3.5hrs and ~200Gb.
While running some tests with the SEPP placements in Qiita we noticed that the current code rewrites the placements as:
which is currently not supported by
bp
so we had to rewrite them as:Thus, wondering if this is enough or if there is any reason why
bp
should support both.cc: @sjanssen2; BTW the current version can add all the Qiita 150bp deblur fragments into the GG/SEPP backbone in < 3.5hrs and ~200Gb.