Closed tkosciol closed 7 years ago
Currently, split_sequence names outputs this way:
>NZ_GG666849.1_2 # 798 # 2885 # -1 # ID=1_2;partial=00;start_type=TTG;rbs_motif=AGxAGG/AGGxGG;rbs_spacer=5-10bp;gc_cont=0.499_1-222
i.e. residues FROM and TO are at the very end. It's acceptable, because it makes the name unique, but it wold be better to have it like:
>NZ_GG666849.1_2_1-222 # 798 # 2885 # -1 # (...)
i.e. name in the format: > genome_gene_residues # other_annotations
> genome_gene_residues # other_annotations
please commit changes to split_search branch
split_search
Currently, split_sequence names outputs this way:
i.e. residues FROM and TO are at the very end. It's acceptable, because it makes the name unique, but it wold be better to have it like:
i.e. name in the format:
> genome_gene_residues # other_annotations