Closed wasade closed 5 years ago
@wasade - do you have an explicit ordination results file that shows these wonky results?
I'm not able to reproduce these results - it'll be great if we could patch it before the next release.
Franck does -- unsure what his GH handle is, I'll follow up on the relevant email thread and ask him to provide context here.
ok, got the ordination file from Franck. Below are the eigenvalues / proportion explained
Eigvals 3
0.3058593288174586 2.3895480775642652 9.001766424679664
Proportion explained 3
0.0010773261702244183 0.06575598584302014 0.9331666879867555
These values looks reasonable to me, but the emperor plot doesn't reflect this at all. Below is the file. Not sure why this is the case - I wonder if it has to do with the ordering of the eigenvalues in #86 . Let's try to knock out that issue first and see if this error remains.
CC @ElDeveloper just in case.
File is below latent_dim_3_input_prior_1.00_output_prior_1.00_beta1_0.85_beta2_0.90_ordination.txt
Thanks @wasade @FranckLejzerowicz this should be addressed now.
The produced biplots can sometimes have surprising proportions explained, such that
axis 1 < axis 2 < axis 3
or where the proportion explained for an axis is > 100%. It would be nice ifmmvec
generated a warning when these scenarios are observed in the results and to suggest that the user may not want to use the output.