Closed wasade closed 5 years ago
Yes, we will want to make sure that this is consistent with previous ordinations. Adding to the version 1 agenda
I would also document another issue here that's in fact related to the ordering: --> the proportions explained in the biplot are sometime >100%,
e.g. image:
and when you edit the ordinations by re-ordering
Proportion explained 3
0.0010773261702244183 0.06575598584302014 0.9331666879867555
to
Proportion explained 3
0.9331666879867555 0.06575598584302014 0.0010773261702244183
It display the proportions explained correctly
e.g. image:
However, you may want to the check the consistency of the coordinates along these axes...
Thanks!
Thanks @wasade @FranckLejzerowicz this should be addressed now.
When visualizing biplots, the proportion explained for axis 1 is less than the proportion explained for axis 2, which is less than the proportion explained for axis 3. An example of this can be found in the screenshot below.
Typically, users of EMPeror are accustom to interpreting axis 1 as explaining the most variation in the data. At present, this ordering reflects an inversion which may catch users off guard.