Open hites77 opened 1 year ago
Hi @hites77,
I apologize for the delay in seeing this. At the moment, I'm primarily monitoring the QIIME 2 forum for questions.
I'm not sure I understand the question. The .nb file is used for taxonomy classification, whereas the .fna file is just the sequences themselves. Could you provide the commands used?
Best, Daniel
Here are the commands:
Qiime2 commands using full length nb file qiime feature-classifier classify-sklearn --i-classifier amplicon/data/taxonomy/2022.10.backbone.v4.nb.qza --i-reads rep-seqs-dada2.qza --o-classification taxonomy.qza
Qiime2 command using greengenes2 plugin qiime greengenes2 non-v4-16s --i-table table-dada2.qza --i-sequences rep-seqs-dada2.qza --i-backbone 2022.10.backbone.full-length.fna.qza --o-mapped-table table_filtered.gg2.biom.qza --o-representatives rep_seqs_filtered.gg2.fna.qza qiime greengenes2 taxonomy-from-table --i-reference-taxonomy 2022.10.taxonomy.asv.nwk.qza --i-table table_filtered.gg2.biom.qza --o-classification table_filtered_gg2.taxonomy.qza
As I mentioned, previously, this two methods are giving different number of ASVs, so which one of them will be more technically correct ?
I found more number of ASV when using 2022.10.backbone.full-length.nb.qza file directly in QIIME2 for V3-V4 sequence taxonomy prediction in comparison to using 2022.10.backbone.full-length.fna.qza via greengenes2 plugin. So want to know which way is better than other ?