Hi all,
as discussed during today's meeting, it might be good to use common interfaces for exposed workflows of modules belonging to the same category (e.g. alignment).
For example, for a given module in the alignment category the interface could include INDEX, MAP and ALIGN. So, for the current STAR module, one would rename the exposed workflows as follows:
STAR_INDEX -> INDEX
STAR_INDEX_NOANNO -> move to INDEX and use some logic or an optional input to use the same workflow with/without theannotation (if not really possible include INDEX_NOANNO to the interface)
Hi all, as discussed during today's meeting, it might be good to use common interfaces for exposed workflows of modules belonging to the same category (e.g.
alignment
).For example, for a given module in the
alignment
category the interface could includeINDEX
,MAP
andALIGN
. So, for the current STAR module, one would rename the exposed workflows as follows:STAR_INDEX
->INDEX
STAR_INDEX_NOANNO
-> move toINDEX
and use some logic or an optional input to use the same workflow with/without theannotation (if not really possible includeINDEX_NOANNO
to the interface)STAR_MAP
->MAP
STAR_ALL
->ALIGN
Thoughts and comments are welcome!
Cheers