Open daniswan opened 5 years ago
Are you talking about the 0.00 / 1.00 on top of the chart? if so, that it is indicating the scale (from 0 to 1). That's why every quarter is 0.25, 0.50, 0.75... 1. Makes sense?
Yes. But from the look of it maybe 8% of data was imputes, so it should be 0.08/1.00 or something like that? Or do I not understand?
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:57 PM David JM notifications@github.com wrote:
Are you talking about the 0.00 / 1.00 on top of the chart? if so, that it is indicating the scale (from 0 to 1). That's why every quarter is 0.25, 0.50, 0.75... 1. Makes sense?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/biodavidjm/artMS/issues/104#issuecomment-490734126, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE5CEAV7CZINUQCFJ6HGCRLPUOOJRANCNFSM4HLVL4JQ .
Well, just by using the reference axis, the proportion of imputed values should be a little bit less than 0.0625 (>6%). Can you check if that is the actual percentage of imputed values? I'll try to add the legend with the actual values.
results.imputation.pdf output file from AnalysisQuantifications functions. In image, the percentage/fraction of imputed values is shown as zero, when clearly it is not zero.