We now start to have persons born in the 2000s. For the InternId we now use a "+" and not a "-" when adding the last digit.
Our oldest person, Osvald Häggdahl, born in 1900, has 000814-1.
Our youngest person (doing point counts). born in 2000, has 000827+1.
When extracting the winter point count data as a CSV, in the first two columns (persnr, rnr) I for Osvald get 000814-1 and 01.
When extracting the winter point count data as a CSV, in the first two columns (persnr, rnr) I for Elin get 000814+1-01 and "blank". Thus, the route number is added to the InterntId and left out from the rnr column.
I have done my best to check that the input data is in the same form for both. Of course i could have made a mistake somewhere, but I have a strong feeling that there is something with the "+" that screws things up.
I can add that when exporting data for Standardrutter, the few persons with "+1" come out as they should.
We now start to have persons born in the 2000s. For the InternId we now use a "+" and not a "-" when adding the last digit. Our oldest person, Osvald Häggdahl, born in 1900, has 000814-1. Our youngest person (doing point counts). born in 2000, has 000827+1. When extracting the winter point count data as a CSV, in the first two columns (persnr, rnr) I for Osvald get 000814-1 and 01. When extracting the winter point count data as a CSV, in the first two columns (persnr, rnr) I for Elin get 000814+1-01 and "blank". Thus, the route number is added to the InterntId and left out from the rnr column. I have done my best to check that the input data is in the same form for both. Of course i could have made a mistake somewhere, but I have a strong feeling that there is something with the "+" that screws things up. I can add that when exporting data for Standardrutter, the few persons with "+1" come out as they should.