@kyook @draciti
The proposed workflow is to download the linking summaries tables for the curated GSA articles, revert and re-link the articles and re-download the tables. These can then be compared to provide some stats about how accurate the initial linking is and how much work the curators do.
It is trivial to write a python script to do the comparisons, but there is no straightforward way to automate retrieving the linking summary tables and do the revert/re-link steps. I can do it manually, but it will be time-consuming.
@kyook @draciti The proposed workflow is to download the linking summaries tables for the curated GSA articles, revert and re-link the articles and re-download the tables. These can then be compared to provide some stats about how accurate the initial linking is and how much work the curators do. It is trivial to write a python script to do the comparisons, but there is no straightforward way to automate retrieving the linking summary tables and do the revert/re-link steps. I can do it manually, but it will be time-consuming.