Closed jmetz closed 8 months ago
Wasn't the consensus to switch to bioimageio.yaml
??
😅 @oeway asked me to switch it back... I'll let you two discuss 🫣
Wasn't the consensus to switch to
bioimageio.yaml
??
No, if I remember correctly the concensus was to not touch it, see the last item in the meeting minutes here: https://github.com/bioimage-io/bioimage.io/issues/28#issuecomment-1802276877
ah, thanks, sorry for the confusion!
@FynnBe @mese79 mentioned:
Uploader expects a rdf.yaml file to be present in the model zip package, but the spec export functionality puts the model specs bioimageio.yaml file.
I thought you already changed back to rdf.yaml, could you confirm?
Anyway, I've made a PR: https://github.com/bioimage-io/bioimageio-uploader/pull/93
I thought you already changed back to rdf.yaml, could you confirm?
I thought I had, but in fact there is still a preference of bioimageio.yaml
over rdf.yaml
I suppose...
Made a PR to fix it in the next spec release: https://github.com/bioimage-io/spec-bioimage-io/pull/626
ah, I remember: I did change how the collection handles it, so that on bioimage.io it's all rdf.yaml
...
I suppose the PR would still be good to avoid confusion
As decision on this renaming was to stick with original for now.