Open jjuhh opened 3 years ago
Hi, Kaiju team.
Using a "kaiju-multi" has the same number of lines(reads) in output file as using single "kaiju"
wc -l sample.A.kaiju.out > 1635254 wc -l sample.B.kaiju.out > 1949596 wc -l sample.A.B.kaiju.out > 3584850
but, the values of counts(column 3) and percentage(coulmn 2) was not same. (after kaiju2table)
fgrep -w "67082" sample.A.kaiju.out.table > sample.A.kaiju.out.table 0.342276 6673 67082 NA;BeAn 58058 virus fgrep -w "67082" sample.B.kaiju.out.table >sample.B.kaiju.out.table 0.802077 13116 67082 NA;BeAn 58058 virus fgrep -w "67082" sample.A.B.kaiju.out.table > sample.A.B.kaiju.out.table 0.740505 26546 67082 BeAn 58058 virus
Why is this results? and if both results are not wrong, which one is better to use, kaiju or kaiju-multi, when comparing the virome of case control study?
Hi,
would it be possible to send me the zipped output files of kaiju and kaiju2table?
Hi, Kaiju team.
Using a "kaiju-multi" has the same number of lines(reads) in output file as using single "kaiju"
but, the values of counts(column 3) and percentage(coulmn 2) was not same. (after kaiju2table)
Why is this results? and if both results are not wrong, which one is better to use, kaiju or kaiju-multi, when comparing the virome of case control study?