codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 26.66% and project coverage change: -0.04 :warning:
Comparison is base (
61fe8c1) 74.91% compared to head (52b800a) 74.88%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #267 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 74.91% 74.88% -0.04% ========================================== Files 97 97 Lines 20696 20705 +9 ========================================== Hits 15504 15504 - Misses 5192 5201 +9 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/biolab/orange-canvas-core/pull/267?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=biolab) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [orangecanvas/registry/discovery.py](https://codecov.io/gh/biolab/orange-canvas-core/pull/267?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=biolab#diff-b3JhbmdlY2FudmFzL3JlZ2lzdHJ5L2Rpc2NvdmVyeS5weQ==) | `38.28% <15.38%> (-0.97%)` | :arrow_down: | | [orangecanvas/registry/utils.py](https://codecov.io/gh/biolab/orange-canvas-core/pull/267?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=biolab#diff-b3JhbmdlY2FudmFzL3JlZ2lzdHJ5L3V0aWxzLnB5) | `93.65% <100.00%> (-0.10%)` | :arrow_down: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=biolab). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=biolab):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
This PR changes the resolving the category name to follow this order,
NAMEfrom package globals,"widgets". Now it takes the penultimate part in that case.Previously, the first two points were reversed. I think package globals should have precedence because they are explicit.
Besides, the entry point is always defined (has to be, AFAIK), so the name from package globals was ignored. As result, we couldn't translate category names.